Kamis, 14 April 2011

Integrated communications approach to PR…the content marketing way.

Integrated communications approach to PR…the content marketing way.


One of the two specialties that could change public relations is content management, according to John Bell’s blog post. Now, I’ve always been an active proponent of the content-based approach to PR and have written about it in the past too (PR 2.0? Be THE client! and How do you do PR?, among others). But, beyond piecemeal perspectives on the importance of content in the PR business, here’s a broader perspective on the way PR could approach content.
I notice most PR agencies (including us, Edelman India) using a standard PR approach that is heavily dependent on mainstream media. Now, this is a logical thing to do given how mainstream media rules, in terms of attention and reach. But, increasingly, I also see clients demanding an integrated communications plan that includes social media as an integral part of the PR exercise – instead of treating it as a separate silo.
So, here’s a possible way that would help integrate social media as part of integrated communications – not just in words, but in process, operations and also articulation. This method approaches PR more as a content marketing exercise and less as a relationship exercise. In a way, relationship becomes one of the basic necessities in order to market content successfully.

The starting point now, in any PR discussion, is ‘placing <stuff> in media’. If PR, or communications, is a content game (as I have always believed it to be), then ideally, our starting point should be content. So, our commitment should then be in terms of creation of content.
Once the umbrella theme for the client is identified, we then work on a quarterly (or half-yearly) basis to identify content that we can create on behalf of the client – content that would be perceived to be useful or interesting to select target audiences that the client wants to reach out to.
When I say content, don’t assume it as a 5 page whitepaper. Each piece of content could simply be a 2 paragraph thought and we use a detailed content marketing plan to chart how we will utilize each month’s content.
So, that 2 paragraph piece could take the form of a tweet, a blog post, a press release, a billboard, a pitch note for an interview and so on – we plot the plan in the template so the team just works on sharing content via the most appropriate channel and also tweak to content to fit each channel.
You would also notice paid media listed under this layer, including things as far from PR as outdoor media! My question is – why not? If a client has something to announce/share, looking at that content from a single source (as against seeing it from the PR angle or marketing angle) could help make better use of that piece of content. Streamlining the content at the right time and using the right tools could become easier if seen from a single, larger perspective of what that piece of content is aimed at achieving.
All this happens in the first layer, which only utilizes those channels of communication that are not owned by the client.
The 2nd layer is meant for owned media and we plot the same content as we will use in channels owned by the client.
Layer 3 talks of those activities that need to be done to support the other 2 layers – this involves maintenance (and creation, where needed) of owned-media channels, mainstream media and social media monitoring reports and so on.
From a client’s point of view, they get an integrated plan that starts with content and offers a holistic content marketing plan. As for measurement, we just need to find ways to track the reach of our content across all these channels.
Now, this may be too heavy for some clients, but it would help if we educate current and prospective clients gradually to use this method. It helps in the long run that we’re not working backwards from media, but forwards…starting with what the client/brand has that is worth sharing/talking about and marketing that content to the appropriate target audiences.
I’m sure I may not be the first to cook up something like this and there may be other models similar to this already in existence. If you’re in the PR space, I’d love to know your take on this model.

Social Networking Safer Than We Think

Social Networking Safer Than We Think

15 Apr 2011

Social media has been called ‘dangerous’ for young people, but new research suggests otherwise

Concerned parents and an inflammatory media will perhaps be surprised to learn that a recent study has revealed that young people are actually far better equipped to deal with online safety issues than is popularly assumed.
The Cooperative Research Centre for Young People, Technology and Wellbeing (YAW-CRC) has found that young people themselves are the most valuable resource for adults concerned about the online safety of their children.
Researchers from the University of Western Sydney, Murdoch University and the Inspire Foundation have released the first two reports of the YAW-CRC. The research consists of a literature review on the Benefits of Social Networking Services and the results of a ‘living lab’ study on Intergenerational Attitudes towards Social Networking and Cybersafety in which researchers supported a group of young people as they developed and delivered a cybersafety education workshop for a group of parents with teenage children.
The research found that not only were young people generally able to protect themselves online, but that social networking actually held several benefits, including enhancing education, supporting personal relationships, providing safe opportunities to explore their identities and increasing the sense of community and belonging.
Young people are at home in social media

Young people are at home in social media

‘Our research has shown that young people have an incredible amount of expertise,’ says Dr Amanda Third from the University of Western Sydney. ‘With support they can be an excellent source of information and education for parents seeking to realistically assess the cybersafety risks their children face.’
This research fleshes out the previously uncharted territory of how young people engage with online tools and makes for some compelling evidence for the use of social media to help young people feel connected. It also offers benefits for parents and researchers working with young people (as opposed to making assumptions about their activity based on negative case studies).
While the online world is one older generations have had to learn, this sort of research demonstrates just how fluently our youth speaks social media.
‘It was really fantastic to have a young person who was able to show me the techniques that she uses to be able to block, or filter or manage her online relationships,’ says Maxine, a parent and research participant.
It seems that young people not only know acronyms that would baffle baby boomers and many Gen X-ers (ROFLMAO springs to mind), they also know how to be safe online.
Which means learning from them, as opposed to restricting them, is the best bet for creating an online space that is safer for everyone.

Kamis, 07 April 2011

How small business can avoid becoming the next GoDaddy

CHICAGO | Wed Apr 6, 2011 4:53pm EDT
CHICAGO (Reuters) -
Social media is great for spreading the word but sometimes its content can become the elephant in the room, quite literally.
Just ask Bob Parsons, the flamboyant founder and CEO of Web hosting site GoDaddy, who posted a video link of his elephant shoot in Zimbabwe on his Twitter account last month.
The controversial dispatch was the latest in a string of high-profile social media gaffes, highlighted recently by insensitive remarks about the Egyptian uprising by fashion designer Kenneth Cole and Japan's earthquake by comedian Gilbert Gottfried. Gottfried's behavior cost him a longstanding gig as the voice of the Aflac insurance duck.
The move by Parsons, known for provocative tactics that include Super Bowl ads with scantily-clad women, was also not without fallout. His personal blog is replete with customers threatening to pull their GoDaddy business. Meanwhile, the company lost high-profile accounts such as People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA).
"Did you miss the fact that your customer base includes people who would be disgusted by this? It was so incredibly childish, egotistic and in very poor taste, I can hardly believe it," said "Russell," a respondent on the blog.
Parsons, who has more than 30,000 Twitter followers (twitter.com/DrBobParsons), hasn't apologized. Instead, he stridently defends his actions, leading many to believe he relishes the attention.
"The video was posted on my personal video.me channel (www.bobparsons.me) and came with a warning that it was graphic," he wrote. "I posted it because I wanted people see what the people over there endure and how problem elephant are dealt with. Doing what I did is the best way I know of to help those subsistence and starving farmers."
Most small business owners, whether or not they buy Parsons' line of reasoning, will never be caught up in such a public spectacle. Even so, the wide-reaching impact of Twitter, Facebook and other online channels represents dangerous waters. Small businesses, which often rely heavily on social media for customer awareness, can't afford costly mistakes.
NO LAUGHING MATTER
"My advice to small business is don't do a Parsons," said branding strategist Jonathan Salem Baskin. "Don't confuse customers' interest in knowing about the products and services they buy or could buy with an interest in you personally."
"You make no money from humiliating yourself publicly," he said. "Your customers don't care about your vacation."
Baskin is a proponent of keeping social media content - all marketing for that matter - related to the business at hand. It's fine to engage customers in a dialogue, he said, but make sure the topic pertains directly to the product or service.
"I'd like to hear from Joe's Dry Cleaners that he's getting into environmentally responsible solvents and what his customers think," he said. "Talk to your customers about what matters to them. The technology shouldn't change what you talk about and why you talk."
The lure of social media and its ability to quickly and inexpensively share with the masses are often too tempting to adhere to strict boundaries.
In response to slowing sales in late 2009, entrepreneur Sonny Ahuja, who owns Milwaukee-based retail site GrandPerfumes (www.grandperfumes.com), began hosting a regular Saturday morning Twitter show that included "dumb blonde" jokes that offended some viewers.

HOW TO: Optimize Your Content for Social Discovery

Social Media is About Conversation, Not Conversion

Social Media is About Conversation, Not Conversion

By Mark Evans - Wednesday, April 6th, 2011 at 7:30 am (Copy)
With the growing focus on return on investment (ROI), it should not be a surprise many companies could start looking at sales as an increasingly important metric for success.
This, however, would be a mistake because social media is not a hard sales medium. This is not to suggest it can’t be used to encourage sales but social media does not work well if a primary goal is closing deals.
Nevertheless, this may not stop many companies from thinking otherwise because, after all, what’s the use of doing social media if it doesn’t benefit the bottom line.
The reality, at least if you follow best practices, is that social media is about conversation not conversion. Sure, conversation is over-used member of the social media mantra but it’s probably the best way to describe the way social media can be effectively used to start and build relationships with consumers.
Social media is a way for companies to get their foot in the door. It’s a way to make consumers aware of who you are and what you do. If it can capture someone’s attention, there is an opportunity to educate, entertain or engage them with relevant or interesting content. And then there might be a chance to convert them into customers.
In many respects, this process is like dating. It’s impossible to meet someone at a party, and then marry you the next day – unless, of course, you’re partying in Las Vegas. In a normal situation, you meet someone, go on a few dates to get to know them better, and then see where the relationship leads. Maybe you get married in the future, maybe not but it takes time to get there.
When social media works well, it offers a variety of ways to encourage consumers to think differently about a company, and their products and services. It could be how a company answers questions, provides valuable resources, handles customer service, or provide relevant information.
At the end of the day, all these things contribute to convincing a consumer to start thinking about buying a company’s products or services – aka the “soft sell”.
Selling soft doesn’t mean not selling effectively or well. It means being measured and patient when dealing with consumers. It means not looking for the instant sale even when it looks so close you can taste it. Consumers can smell desperation, and the more you try to “hard sell” them the more your chances of doing so start to disappear.